Skip to content

03 / REVIEW

Completion deserves a second question.

Keep agent-reported success separate from human acceptance with an explicit outcome review record.

Conceptual illustration of a precision dial marking a deliberate human approval point

WHY IT MATTERS

Finished and accepted are different states.

A run can finish successfully and still produce an incomplete report, an irrelevant summary, or a result that needs correction. Make the quality decision visible.

TOOLCAISE / SUPERVISIONILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE

RUN HISTORY

Weekly research brief

Reported complete
Collect sources
Reported
Draft the brief
Reported
Human outcome review
Awaiting review

An agent reports completion. Your team decides whether the result meets the brief.

01

Review the actual deliverable

Open the reported artifact in its source system. Compare it with the task brief, check supporting evidence, and confirm the output is usable before accepting the outcome.

02

Record a human decision

Accept or reject the reported outcome with review context. Keep the agent’s completion claim and the reviewer’s judgement distinct so neither is mistaken for the other.

03

Use rejected work to improve the next run

Look for repeated missing sources, formatting problems, or unsupported conclusions. Feed those specific observations back into the workflow you own.

START WITH ONE WORKFLOW

Put your next run
under supervision.

Connect the agent you already run. Build confidence from the work you can actually review.